Skip to main content
· 5/30/2006

Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha (Also Trading as Sharp Corporation) v. Thinksharp, Inc.

Citations

  • 448 F.3d 1368
  • 79 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1376
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 13314
  • 2006 WL 1459890

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “when a party did not have an opportunity to litigate disputed issues, a decision to permit such litigation is favored”
  • “when a party did not have an opportunity to litigate disputed issues, a decision to permit such litigation is favored”
  • “when a party did not have an opportunity to litigate disputed issues, a decision to permit such litigation is favored”
  • “Res judicata . . . refers to the effect of a judgment in foreclosing relitigation of a mat- ter that has been litigated and decided.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Lourie, Schall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.