Sharp Electronics Corp. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that § 1581(i) jurisdiction encompasses administration of a settlement agreement in anti-dumping action
• jurisdiction exists under § 1581(i), which encompasses the administration of a settlement agreement in an antidumping action
• subsection 1581(i) jurisdiction found to encompass administration of a settlement agreement in antidump-ing action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sharp Electronics Corp. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 1990-01-04· cited 13×
• Conoco Inc. v. United States Foreign-Trade Zones Board
  Court of International Trade· 1992-04-07· cited 10×
• NSK LTD. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2006-01-31· cited 6×
• Phibro Energy, Inc. v. Franklin
  Court of International Trade· 1993-05-21· cited 6×
• Sharp Corp. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 1989-11-15· cited 5×
• Kejriwal Iron and Steel Works, Ltd. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 1990-01-26· cited 5×
• Nippon Pillow Block Sales Co., Ltd. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 1993-04-23· cited 5×
• Seafood Exporters Ass'n of India v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2007-03-13· cited 3×
• Pope Products, division of Purex v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 1991-06-18

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.
  Supreme Court· 1980-12-15· cited 790×
• Goodyear Atomic Corp. v. Miller
  Supreme Court· 1988-05-23· cited 319×
• K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 99×
• National Corn Growers Ass'n v. Baker
  Federal Circuit· 1988-02-09· cited 89×
• Old Republic Insurance v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 1986-09-09· cited 21×
• Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 1988-05-25· cited 16×
• Krupp Stahl AG v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 1982-12-13· cited 13×
• Special Commodity Group on Non-Rubber Footwear From Brazil v. Baldridge
  Court of International Trade· 1983-11-23· cited 9×