SHARON YONTEF, Individually, and as Personal Representative, etc. v. JASON COPELOW

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting Mohr as recognizing only defamation by implication due to omitted facts
• defamatory character of the language must be “apparent from the words 21 themselves” rather than “by innuendo or by the conclusions of the pleader.”
• rejecting discussion of defamation by implication in Mohr as dicta

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).