Sharon Wade v. Aetna Life Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming that the procedural-irregularities component of “Woo still applies” post-Glenn but concluding that “the de novo standard [the beneficiary] suggests is not warranted in situations such as this”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).