Sharon Schneider v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• crediting lay witness 25 evidence the ALJ rejected and remanding case for payment of benefits
• evaluating an ALJ’s assessment of lay evidence in the form of letters
• “both the ALJ and the district court erred when they failed to consider the 15 letters from Ms. Schneider’s friends and ex-employers”
• ALJ improperly excluded letters from 20 friends and ex-employers which established that claimant was unable to perform the 21 responsibilities of her job without her supervisors or co-workers continually telling her what to 22 do.
• full scale IQ of 77 classified as \Borderline Mental Retardation\
• full scale IQ of 77 classified as “Borderline Mental Retardation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).