Skip to main content
· 3/14/1988

Sharon O'Neal v. Constance Gonzalez

Citations

  • 839 F.2d 1437
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3169
  • 1988 WL 13588

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the insurance policy is not a traditional contract between an insured and the insurer but a federal policy governed by federal law
  • finding that an “insured’s designation of beneficiary under FEGLI prevails for all purposes” despite contractual agreement to do otherwise
  • “while the result may be harsh, the language and intent of the statute are clear”
  • Congress' intent under FEGLIA was to establish an \inflexible rule\ that only the beneficiary would receive the policy proceeds, \regardless of other documents or the equities in a particular case.\
  • “. . . Congress intended to establish ... an inflexible rule that the beneficiary designated in accordance with the statute would receive the policy proceeds, regardless of other documents or the equities in a particular case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roney, Hatchett, Hodges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.