· 10/26/1983
Sharon M. IVANOV-McPHEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WASHINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, and Herbert Geist, Defendants-Appellees
Citations
- 719 F.2d 927
- 37 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1223
- 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15794
- 33 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 58
- 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33,888
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Apart from the maintenance of these separate docket entries, however, we can perceive no purpose for which these actions have not been treated as one.”
- “Apart from the maintenance of these separate docket entries, however, we can perceive no purpose for which these actions have not been treated as one.”
- “[A]ctions which have been consolidated do not lose their separate identity.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pell, Cudahy, Gibson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.