Skip to main content
· 10/26/1983

Sharon M. IVANOV-McPHEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WASHINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, and Herbert Geist, Defendants-Appellees

Citations

  • 719 F.2d 927
  • 37 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1223
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15794
  • 33 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 58
  • 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33,888

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Apart from the maintenance of these separate docket entries, however, we can perceive no purpose for which these actions have not been treated as one.”
  • “Apart from the maintenance of these separate docket entries, however, we can perceive no purpose for which these actions have not been treated as one.”
  • “[A]ctions which have been consolidated do not lose their separate identity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pell, Cudahy, Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.