Sharon Lang v. Northwestern University and Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that former employee did not know “about any concrete false statement made to the Federal Reserve or any other federal agency”
• affirming district court's decision that plaintiff \played the part of Chicken Little\ by imagining fraud with no reasonable basis or proof behind her belief
• upholding the district court’s grant of summary judgment against an employee’s FCA retaliation claim
• The FCA protects only “objectively reasonable reports,” not an “employee . . . who just imagines fraud but lacks proof.”
• The FCA protects only “objectively reasonable reports,” not an “employee . . . who just imagines fraud but lacks proof.”
• The FCA protects only “objectively reasonable reports,” not an “employee . . . who just imagines fraud but lacks proof.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).