Sharon Hageman, Admx. Of the Estate of Donald Hageman v. Signal L. P. Gas, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Court cannot deny a motion for leave to amend solely because of delay
• “[W]here the parties are the same, ... an amendment which adds another claim arising out of the same transaction or occurrence does relate back to the date of the original complaint.”
• claim that violation of state and federal statutes and negligent provision of gas to defective heater related back to claim of failure adequately to odorize gas and to warn of proper safety precautions to be used with gas
• “where the parties are the same, . . . an amendment which adds another claim arising out of the same transaction or occurrence does relate back to the date of the original complaint”
• “where the parties are the same, we think the better rule is that an amendment which adds another claim arising out of the same transaction or occurrence does relate back to the date of the original complaint.”
• “[W]here the parties are the same, we think the better rule is that an amendment which adds another claim arising out of the same transaction or occurrence does relate back to the date of the original complaint.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).