Sharon Conant v. Entergy Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the court “must first 23 make a threshold finding that the document [evidencing an agreement] at least purports to be ... a 24 contract.”
• finding that only 2 after the Court “make[s] a threshold finding that the document [evidencing an agreement] at least 3 purports to be . . . a contract” does the Court proceed to decide whether the parties should be 4 compelled to submit their dispute to arbitration
• courts “must first make a threshold finding that 25 the document [evidencing an agreement] at least purports to be . . . a contract”
• court “must first make a threshold finding that 4 the document [evidencing an agreement] at east purports to be . . . a contract”
• \[W]e need not decide whether the Brennan rule applies when one or more party is unsophisticated. Both parties here are sophisticated with respect to contracting for insurance policies.\
• “[b]ecause the parties . . . incorporated AAA rules into their arbitration agreement, they have clearly and unmistakably indicated their intent to submit arbitrability questions to an arbitrator”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).