· 5/26/2000
Sharon B. Pollard, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours Company, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
Citations
- 213 F.3d 933
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 11750
- 78 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,057
- 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1659
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the McDonnell Douglas framework cannot apply to a hostile work environment sexual harassment claim because “there is no legitimate justification for such an environment, and thus recourse to the McDonnell Douglas test is not warranted”
- explaining that the McDonnell Douglas framework cannot apply to a hostile work environment sexual harassment claim because “there is no legitimate justification for such an environment, and thus recourse to the McDonnell Douglas test is not warranted”
- explaining that the McDonnell Douglas framework cannot apply to a hostile work environment sexual harassment claim because “there is no legitimate justification for such an environment, and thus recourse to the McDonnell Douglas test is not warranted”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clay, Cudahy, Merritt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.