Sharon Andrade v. Charles A. Lauer, Acting Administrator, Office of Juvenile Justice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• retaining jurisdiction over allegation that officials responsible for reduction-in-force action held office in violation of the Appointments Clause
• district court must entertain constitutional claim where claim cannot be brought in grievance procedure agreed to by federal employer and employees under CSRA
• causation requirement met where plaintiffs “objected] to then-having been fired by government officials who were constitutionally disqualified from exercising power over them”
• plaintiffs injured by RIF had standing to challenge it on the grounds that they were “fired by government officials who were constitutionally disqualified from exercising power over them”
• “When the statutory and constitutional claims are ‘premised on the same facts’ and the CSRA remedy ‘would have been fully effective in remedying the constitutional violation,’ exhaustion is mandated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).