Sharman v. Skaggs Companies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Plaintiff having introduced specific evidence of negligence, cannot invoke the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.”
• Rules 703 and 705 do not authorize use of one expert’s report in cross-examining another expert when the former’s report “was not referred to by [the latter] in formulating his opinion”
• discussion of a report’s findings on cross-examination introduced hearsay statements from report

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).