Sharma v. Duracell, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting judgment on the pleadings where the alleged harm—inability to receive communications that were necessary to locate a prescription—was “not part of the class of foreseeable hazards that an innkeeper’s failure to answer the telephone could be said to create”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).