Skip to main content
· 8/20/1990

Shapoff v. Scull

Citations

  • 222 Cal. App. 3d 1457
  • 272 Cal. Rptr. 480
  • 1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 888

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Thus it is plain that contrary to the defendants’ argument on appeal, abuse of the corporate privilege by itself does not require that a court disregard the separate identity of a corporation. There must be some equitable purpose which will be served by ignoring the corporate form”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.