Shapleigh v. Mier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The law of Mexico . . . remains foreign law to be proven as a fact when written by production of copies of the Constitution and statutes, and in other respects by the testimony of experts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. VEB Carl Zeiss, Jena
  S.D. New York· 1968-11-07· cited 58×
• Cobb v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1951-08-27· cited 32×
• Shapleigh v. United Farms Co.
  Fifth Circuit· 1938-12-07· cited 13×
• First National City Bank v. Compania De Aguaceros, S. A.
  First Circuit· 1968-03-27· cited 11×
• Kevin Jumlist v. Prime Insurance Co.
  Eleventh Circuit· 2024-02-08· cited 10×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Oetjen v. Central Leather Co.
  Supreme Court· 1918-03-11· cited 467×
• United States v. Percheman
  Supreme Court· 1833-02-14· cited 249×
• Slater v. Mexican National Railroad
  Supreme Court· 1904-04-11· cited 239×
• Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Forsberg
  Supreme Court· 1926-03-01· cited 226×
• Lewellyn v. Electric Reduction Co.
  Supreme Court· 1927-11-21· cited 167×
• Fremont v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1855-03-10· cited 68×
• Arthur C. Harvey Co. v. Malley
  Supreme Court· 1933-03-13· cited 41×
• Pierce v. Indseth
  Supreme Court· 1883-01-18· cited 37×
• United States v. Perot
  Supreme Court· 1879-03-10· cited 36×
• Eastman Kodak Co. v. Gray
  Supreme Court· 1934-05-21· cited 23×