Skip to main content
· 6/24/1998

Shapiro v. Sutherland

Citations

  • 76 Cal. Rptr. 2d 101
  • 64 Cal. App. 4th 1534
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 7153
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4978
  • 1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 574

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that former home owners could be liable for failure to disclose nuisance problem to relocation ser vice, despite lack of contractual privity with purchaser
  • “[F]or a defendant to be liable for fraud, he or she must intend that a particular representation (or concealment) be relied upon by a specific person or persons.”
  • in an action against the original seller, the intermediate seller remained a necessary party “because of the nature of [the] particular transaction” whereby the intermediate seller retained the plaintiffs money, preventing the plaintiff from obtaining “complete relief’ without it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Croskey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.