Shapiro v. 89th St. Dev. Co. LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, absent proper time extension, a district court may not entertain an untimely Rule 29 motion
• holding that a court may not grant an untimely postverdict motion for a judgment of acquittal when the prosecutor objects
• holding that a district court is without discretion to grant a defendant's untimely motion for judgment of acquittal pursuant to Rule 29
• holding that a district court had no authority to grant a motion for judgment of acquittal filed one day outside of Rule 29(c)’s time limit
• holding that plain and unambiguous language of Rule 29 does not permit the granting of an untimely post-verdict motion for judgment of acquittal
• holding that a district court had no authority to grant a motion for judgment of acquittal filed one day outside of Rule 29(c)’s time limit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).