Shanxi Hairui Trade Co., Ltd. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that subheading 3823.90.29 is a “basket provision” that cannot be applied until other provisions of the HTSUS are examined to determine if the subject merchandise is more appropriately classified elsewhere
• denying summary judgment because of conflicting evidence as to the principal use of thermochromic liquid crystals
• denying summary judgment because of conflicting evidence as to the principal use of thermochromic liquid crystals
• finding it unnecessary to apply presumption of correctness on summary judgment motion concerning whether genuine issue of material fact exists
• “the principal use of the class ... is controlling, not the principal use of the specific import”
• “the principal use of the class . . . is controlling, not the principal use of the specific import”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).