Shantz v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where testimony concerning a defendant’s silence was not intentionally elicited, a cautionary instruction, in the discretion of the trial judge, will suffice
• “The State may not comment on a defendant’s exercise of the constitutional right to remain silent.’’
• “The State may not comment on a defendant’s exercise of the constitutional right to remain silent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).