Skip to main content

Shannon v. State

Citations

  • 770 So. 2d 714
  • 2000 WL 1582767

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that it was not necessary to explain why a prospective juror for whom the additional peremptory challenge was sought was objectionable; they must merely identify that individual as objectionable
  • defendant not required to explain why juror who sat on panel is objectionable because peremptory challenge need not be based on any specific reason
  • It is not necessary that a defendant explain why the venireperson for whom the additional peremptory challenge was sought was objectionable; they must merely identify that individual as objectionable.
  • “Neither Trotter [v. State, 576 So.2d 691 (Fla.1990

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Klein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.