Shannon v. Marshall Schools

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Hartman’s live pleadings and affidavits, “which we are required to consider as evidence under the TCPA, alleged facts if neither rebutted nor contradicted, demonstrate the elements of causes of action for malicious prosecution and civil conspiracy as to Walker”
• concluding that Hartman’s live pleadings and affidavits, “which we are required to consider as evidence under the TCPA, alleged facts if neither rebutted nor contradicted, demonstrate the elements of causes of action for malicious prosecution and civil conspiracy as to Walker”
• noting that under the rules that apply to TCPA dismissal hearings, pleadings are considered “as evidence” under the Act
• noting that under the rules that apply to TCPA dismissal hearings, pleadings are considered “as evidence” under the Act
• “Walker’s motion to dismiss under the TCPA survived Hartman’s nonsuiting of certain causes of action.”
• noting pleadings are considered “as evidence” under the TCPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).