Shannon Unrein v. Timesavers, Inc., Third Party v. Foley-Martens Company, Also Known as Foley-Belsaw Company, a Minnesota Corporation, Third Party

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the expert's opinion must be “sufficiently grounded to be helpful to the jury”
• stating that the “evidentiary inquiry is meant to be flexible and fact specific, and a court should use, adapt, or reject Daubert factors as the particular case demands.”
• stating that the “evidentiary inquiry is meant to be flexible and fact specific, and a court should use, adapt, or reject Daubert factors as the particular case demands”
• \[t]here is no single requirement for admissibility as long as the proffer indicates that the expert evidence is reliable and relevant\
• “There is no single requirement for admissibility as long as the proffer indicates that the expert evidence is reliable and relevant.”
• “There is no single requirement for admissibility as long as the proffer indicates that the expert evidence is reliable and relevant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).