Skip to main content
· 1/2/2007

Shannon Kampmier v. Emeritus Corporation

Citations

  • 472 F.3d 930
  • 18 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1607
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12
  • 88 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,650
  • 99 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 755
  • 2007 WL 6072

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that there is no violation of the “regarded as” prong if the condition is not substantially limiting and the employer does not believe that it is
  • “[T]iming alone is insufficient to establish a genuine issue of material fact to support a retaliation claim.”
  • questioning whether plaintiff who maintained some social ties with alleged harasser subjectively viewed harassment as offensive but ulti- mately concluding that plaintiff ’s repeated complaints to supervisors about harasser’s conduct raised a fact issue on this point
  • “[Sustained physical contact can raise otherwise merely objectionable conduct to the level of objectively offensive conduct.”
  • four to five month time lag between complaints of harassment and termination were insufficient to establish cause
  • summary judgment is proper where a Title VII plaintiff fails to establish any of the elements of a prima facie case of discrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Flaum, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.