Skip to main content
· 9/14/2005

Shannon Balmer v. Hca, Inc. Health Care Indemnity, Inc.

Citations

  • 423 F.3d 606
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 19755
  • 86 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,097
  • 96 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 737
  • 2005 WL 2218414

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that sex-based inequality would be perpetuated if prior salary alone justified a difference in pay
  • noting that sex-based inequality would be perpetuated if prior salary alone justified a difference in pay
  • “A wage differential based on education or experience is a factor other than sex for purposes of the Equal Pay Act.”
  • “[I]n this circuit attorneys’ fees may not be awarded to defendants where the plaintiff has asserted at least one non-frivolous claim”
  • “The mere fact that an adverse employment decision occurs after a charge of discrimination is not, standing alone, sufficient to support a finding that the adverse employment decision was in retaliation to the discrimination claim.”
  • “[T]he mere fact that an adverse employment decision occurs after a charge of discrimination is not, standing alone, sufficient to support a finding that the adverse employment decision was in retaliation [for] the discrimination claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Siler, Gibbons, Lawson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.