Shannon B. Boyette v. Carrie E. Sprouse

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “subsequent release or publication ... of a portion of the information [originally given in confidence] does not negate the exemption for any of the information originally given”
• \subsequent release or publication ... of a portion of the information [originally given in confidence] does not negate the exemption for any of the information originally given\
• “[T]he 7(C) balancing test must be conducted with regard to each document, because the privacy interest and the interest of the public in disclosure may vary from document to document.”
• may be occasions where search and review is required to determine if Glomar is appropriate, such as where exemption requires inquiry into whether source was promised confidentiality
• “[O]nce there has been an expressed or implied assurance of confidentiality, a subsequent release or publication by the government of a portion of the information does not negate the exemption for any of the information originally given.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).