Shanks v. Banting Mfg. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff who meets or equals a Listing is \conclusively presumed to be disabled and entitled to benefits\
• holding that “the severity regulation” embodied in Step Two “is valid only if applied to screen out de minimis claims”
• recognizing that the severity determination is meant “to screen out de minimis claims”
• emphasizing that the combined effect of each of a claimant’s impairments on their RFC must be considered, regardless of whether every impairment is severe
• affirming district court's equitable tolling where Social Security Administration systematically applied its regulations in a manner hidden from plaintiffs
• requiring consideration of aE impairments, regardless of severity, to determine whether combined impact of all impairments, renders claimant disabled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).