Shanklin v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding a court committed harmless error in limiting cross-examination of the witness because sufficient evidence existed to support the conviction
• deeming an evidentiary error harmless where “defendant’s counsel ably and fully argued to the jury [a witness’s] bias”
• evidence sufficient to support conviction in absence of witness’ testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).