Skip to main content
· 3/9/2022

Shanklin, Ronald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Nothing we said in Commonwealth v. Bishop . . . makes [rule 13] inapplicable” to motions filed pursuant to that case
  • defendant seeking privileged records, under Commonwealth v. Bishop, 416 Mass. 169 [1993], must disclose stage two submission to prosecutor or forgo seeking privileged records
  • potential invocation of Bishop-Fuller does not render compulsory rules of criminal procedure inapplicable
  • Commonwealth is entitled to protect privileged records not required by Bishop to be disclosed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.