Shanghai Taoen Intern. Trading Co., Ltd. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding non-reliance on entire submission where missing information went to the core of the rate determination
• upholding selection of total AFA where inconsistencies concerned the identity of a party’s suppliers
• “Commerce must not . . . assume the highest previous margin applies simply because it is the one most prejudicial to the respondent”
• respondent has the obligation to place some evidence on the record to dispute an adverse inference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).