Supreme Court· 3/27/1978
Shang v. Holley
Citations
- 435 U.S. 947
- 98 S. Ct. 1532
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- when state adoption of a certain federal standard is a condition of continued approval of its program, that standard controls even if the state standard actually adopted is different
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Berger v. HecklerSecond Circuit· 1985-08-26· cited 104×
- MATTER OF ALIESSA v. NovelloNew York Court of Appeals· 2001-06-05· cited 46×
- Cruz v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1985-06-10· cited 33×
- Papadopoulos v. ShangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1979-03-13· cited 16×
- Antillon v. Department of Employment SecurityUtah Supreme Court· 1984-06-06· cited 14×
- Rubio v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-01-18· cited 13×
- Arteaga v. Industrial Com'n of StateColorado Court of Appeals· 1985-08-19· cited 12×
- Castillo v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1990-12-21· cited 10×
- Szewczyk v. Department of Social ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-05-27· cited 10×
- Vazquez v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals· 1985-12-30· cited 7×
- Brambila v. Board of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-05-08· cited 5×
- Division of Employment & Training v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals· 1985-09-30· cited 4×
- Alvarado v. Board of ReviewUtah Supreme Court· 1987-04-03
Other cases named Shang v. Holley
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.