Skip to main content
· 3/6/2024

Shane Manley v. James Zigras and Avant Mining, LLC

Citations

  • 686 S.W.3d 561
  • 2024 Ark. App. 168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that notwithstanding clauses “supersede all other laws” because “[a] clearer statement is difficult to imagine”
  • suggesting that a phrase preceded by notwithstanding should overcome any conflicting provision
  • interpreting same “notwithstanding” language to supersede all other laws, finding that a clearer statement of intent to supersede is “difficult to imagine”
  • “notwithstanding” clause read broadly to give Secretary of Transportation “broadest possible discre- tion”
  • “[T]he language ‘notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter or any other Act’ means the same thing as ‘notwithstanding any other provision of law.’” (emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.