Shane E. Maxwell v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Court of Criminal Appeals could not independently conclude which occasion was the basis for the conviction and then perform a factual sufficiency review of that conclusion
• holding that the Court of Criminal Appeals could not independently conclude which occasion was the basis for the conviction and then perform a factual sufficiency review of that conclusion
• holding that when the phrase \on divers occasions\ is removed from a specification, the effect is \that the accused has been found guilty of misconduct on a single occasion and not guilty of the remaining occasions.\
• stating that the lower court “did not have the authority to review and affirm [the appellant’s] conviction by selecting the occasion that formed the basis for the conviction and then reviewing that conclusion for factual sufficiency”
• stating that the lower court “did not have the authority to review and affirm [the appellant’s] conviction by selecting the occasion that formed the basis for the conviction and then reviewing that conclusion for factual sufficiency”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).