SHAN ZHU QIU v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that requiring a respondent to “cease the practice of [his religion] or hope to evade discovery . . . runs contrary to the language and purpose of our asylum laws”
• “[T]he only way Qiu can avoid persecution is to cease the practice of [his religion] or hope to evade discovery. Putting Qiu to such a choice runs contrary to the language and purpose of our asylum laws.”
• “[T]he only way Qiu can avoid persecution is to cease the practice of [his religion] or hope to evade discovery. Putting Qiu to such a choice runs contrary to the language and purpose of our asylum laws.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).