SHAMROCK DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that appellate courts “review the construction and application of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure de novo”
• interpreting the service-by-publication rale, Minn. R. Civ. P. 4.04(a), in accordance with its plain language
• “Once the plaintiff submits evidence of service, a defendant who challenges the sufficiency of service of process has the burden of showing that the service was improper.”
• “Once the plaintiff submits evidence of service, a defendant who challenges the sufficiency of service of process has the burden of showing that the service was improper.”
• “Once the plaintiff submits evidence of service, a defendant who challenges the sufficiency of service of process has the burden of showing that the service was improper.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).