Skip to main content
· 4/28/1952

Shammas v. Shammas

Citations

  • 88 A.2d 204
  • 9 N.J. 321
  • 1952 N.J. LEXIS 312

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “All perjury is an affront to the dignity of the court and to the integrity of the judicial process .... ”
  • \All perjury is an affront to the dignity of the court and to the integrity of the judicial process . . . .\
  • \All perjury is an affront to the dignity of the court and to the integrity of the judicial process . . . .\
  • only a party or its legal representative is entitled to seek relief from a judgment
  • “Perjured testimony that warrants disturbance of a final judgment must be shown by clear, convincing and satisfactory evidence to have been ... material to the issue tried and not merely cumulative but probably to have controlled the result.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.