· 4/24/1995
Shames v. Coontz
Citations
- 882 F. Supp. 1173
- 36 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1218
- 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5778
- 1995 WL 254730
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying motion to amend complaint where plaintiff’s amended complaint containing new claims “would require the defendants to devote substantial additional resources to discovery and trial preparation and significantly delay the resolution of [plaintiff’s] current claims.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lasker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.