Shamburg v. Shamburg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that for purposes of workers’ compensation statute, relationship of employer and employee same as relationship of master and servant, except that to be employee as distinguished from servant, one must serve under contract of hire
• holding that for purposes of workers' compensation statute, relationship of employer and employee same as relationship of master and servant, except that to be employee as distinguished from servant, one must serve under contract of hire

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).