Shamblin v. Ohio (In Re Shamblin)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• debtor who receives discharge or will receive discharge upon completion of plan not required to maintain proof of financial responsibility
• statute requiring persons who have had unsatisfied tort judgments discharged in Chapter 13 to maintain proof of financial responsibility was discriminatory and in violation of § 525
• “Ohio’s [statute] is discriminatory and in violation of § 525 of the Bankruptcy Code.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).