Shamash v. Ohrbach's, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no abuse of discretion because appellee provided proof of standing, appellant failed to adequately protect an interest in the property, and remaining factual questions were “irrelevant to the issues before the Bankruptcy Court” and could be argued in other appropriate forums

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).