Shakur Muhammad, A/K/A John E. Mease v. Mark Close

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that proximity may be “significant enough to constitute indirect evidence of a causal connection so as to create an inference of retaliatory motive”
• noting that proximity may be “significant enough to constitute indirect evidence of a causal connection so as to create an inference of retaliatory motive”
• \[T]emporal proximity alone may be significant enough to constitute indirect evidence of a causal connection so as to create an inference of retaliatory motive.\ (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[T]emporal proximity alone may be ‘significant enough to constitute indirect evidence of a causal connection so as to create an inference of retaliatory motive.’”
• Temporal proximity “may be ‘significant enough to constitute indirect evidence of a causal connection so as to create an inference of retaliatory motive.’”
• “[T]emporal proximity alone may be ‘significant enough to constitute indirect evidence of a causal connection so as to create an inference of retaliatory motive.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).