Skip to main content
Fourth Circuit· 12/12/1995

Shakka v. Smith

Citations

  • 71 F.3d 162
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 34961

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that evidence showing warden or security chief knew of and deliberately ignored inmate’s unfulfilled medical need for wheelchair could support finding of deliberate indifference
  • stating that “the failure to provide a wheelchair for an inmate may constitute deliberate indifference to a serious medical need’’
  • holding no constitutional violation when inmate given water and cleaning supplies but denied shower for three days after having human excrement thrown on him
  • noting deliberate indifference requires that a prison official know of and disregard the objectively serious condition or deprivation
  • rejecting Eighth Amendment claim of inmate denied a shower for three days after excrement was thrown on him when he was given another method to clean himself
  • granting summary judgment for prison officials who refused to contravene Doctor’s treatment decisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.