Supreme Court of New Jersey· 6/30/2005

Shah v. Shah

Citations

875 A.2d 931
184 N.J. 125
2005 N.J. LEXIS 815

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over a defendant who “has not ‘purposefully availed’ himself of the laws of New Jersey”
concluding that the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over a defendant who “has not ‘purposefully availed’ himself of the laws of New Jersey”
because “issuance of a prohibitory order does not implicate any of defendant’s substantive rights,” State resident entitled to temporary restraining order providing only prohibitory relief in absence of personal jurisdiction over nonresident defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rivera-Soto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Shah v. Shah

9 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.