Shah Rahman v. Kid Brands, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discounting statements by confidential witness because, inter alia , the confidential witness failed to provide dates for closed-door meetings
• declining to apply core operations doctrine in the absence of allegations demonstrating that Defendants knew the information they disseminated was false
• declining to apply core operations doctrine in the absence of allegations demonstrating that Defendants knew the information they disseminated was false
• discounting information from a confidential witness that consisted of “little more than generalized allegations with few specifics”
• discussing the Third Circuit’s recognition of the core operations doctrine in Avaya, and pointing to the Avaya court’s citation to Metzler Investment GMBH v. Corinthian Colleges, Inc., 540 F.3d 1049, 1068 (9th Cir.2008
• affirming dismissal where confidential source did not have firsthand knowledge of meetings described

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).