Shaffer v. Procter & Gamble

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the PHRA covers only non-job related handicaps or disabilities, that is, those which do not substantially interfere with the ability to perform the essential functions of the employment”
• affirming dismissal of civil conspiracy claim when it was “merely conclusory rather than presenting facts”
• where an employee was injured on the job and wrongfully denied treatment, IIED was preempted because it could have happened to any employee who got injured

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).