Skip to main content
· 8/22/2007

Shaffer v. Potter

Citations

  • 499 F.3d 900
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 19913
  • 90 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,938
  • 101 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 489
  • 2007 WL 2376770

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that statements made by an employee who was not a decision-maker cannot be evidence supporting a prima facie case of sex discrimination under Title VII
  • to establish prima facie case, plaintiff alleging sex discrimination must show \there are facts that give rise to an inference of gender discrimination\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Bright, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.