Shaffer v. Hoke
Citations
- 80 Pa. Super. 434
- 1923 Pa. Super. LEXIS 181
Syllabus
<p>Gift — Certificate of deposit — Delivery without written assignment — Evidence—Sufficiency.</p> <p>Where the mother and brother of the donee testify clearly and satisfactorily that his deceased uncle, during his last illness, took from the bureau drawer in his bedroom a package from which he selected an envelope containing a bank’s certificate of deposit payable to the registered owner, and handed it to the donee, saying, “Here, this is yours,” their testimony is sufficient to establish a gift of the certificate without a written assignment thereof.</p> <p>A valid gift of nonnegotiable securities may be made by delivery of them to the donee without assignment or endorsement in writing. This principal has been applied to notes, bonds, stock and deposit certificates and life insurance policies.</p>
Judges: Gawthrop, Henderson, Keller, Linn, Porter, Trexler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Basket v. HassellSupreme Court· 1883-03-26· cited 177×
- Appeal of WalshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1888-10-08· cited 67×
- Northern Trust Co. v. HuberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1922-05-15· cited 39×
- Craig v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1811-03-30· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. CromptonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1890-10-13· cited 29×
- Scheid v. StorchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1922-01-03· cited 14×
- Hafer v. McKelveySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1903-05-22· cited 13×
- Licey v. LiceySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1847-01-08· cited 10×
- Miles' EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1917-03-13· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.