Skip to main content
· 11/8/2002

Shaffer v. City of Topeka

Citations

  • 57 P.3d 35
  • 30 Kan. App. 2d 1232
  • 2002 Kan. App. LEXIS 988

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a government entity being sued had no duty to inform the plaintiff of the statute of limitations for his claim because it did not possess material knowledge regarding the time bar that the plaintiff could not independently discover
  • “The application of an equitable doctrine [including the doctrine of equitable estoppel] rests within the sound discretion of the district court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rulon, Knudson, Beier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.