Shaffer v. Bellows

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that restraint on alienation is “invalid if the restraint is unreasonable[,] [which] is determined by weighing the utility of the restraint against the injurious consequences of enforcing the restraint” (quoting RESTATEMENT (THIRD
• “We ‘look to extrinsic evidence of the parties’ contractual intent only if the language of the instrument is ambiguous.’ ” (quoting AAA Valley Gravel, Inc. v. Totaro, 219 P.3d 153, 160 (Alaska 2009))
• “ ‘Many circumstantial factors can indicate the existence of fraud’ . . . . Typical badges of fraud include: ‘(1) inadequate consideration, (2) transfer in anticipation of a pending suit, (3) insolvency of the transferor, (4) failure to record, (5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).