Shaff v. Leyland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “that the restrictive covenant was created to personally benefit the respondent as the owner of land that benefited from enforcement of the restriction”
• finding that the original grantor lacked standing because she no longer owned land that benefited from the covenant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).